1 woods I think ... not sure though.
Thanks for dropping by!
NOTE: My outbox is full, so I may not be able to reply to PMs directly - might PM a reply via my alt or through comments.
Student
Somewhere
Joined on 8/20/08
- Level:
- 28
- Exp Points:
- 8,430 / 8,700
- Exp Rank:
- 4,729
- Vote Power:
- 6.96 votes
- Rank:
- General
- Global Rank:
- 402
- Blams:
- 1,969
- Saves:
- 23,283
- B/P Bonus:
- 48%
- Whistle:
- Silver
- Medals:
- 2,487
Comments
Guess again...
It's hilarious because only TAOT members have commented / wrote a respond yet.
This represents our mentality in an awesome way.
Isn't it?
I've been Quicksmasher96 before Wade changed my username to Quicksmasher ;o)
QuickSmasher is good too :)
First mine was sanjeev98, then Sanjeev98, and now Gimmick. I don't want any more name changes; I think I've bothered Wade enough.
Oh I'm going to let my name changed again. I hope it doesn't bother Wade enough.
:3
To what?
* too much
damn logical mistake XD
Okay :P
Asandir
"How much wood could a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?"
"A woodchuck could chuck no amount of wood, since a woodchuck can't chuck wood".
"But if a woodchuck could chuck wood and would chuck some amount of wood, what amount of wood would a woodchuck chuck?"
"Even if a woodchuck could chuck wood, and even if a woodchuck would chuck wood, should a woodchuck chuck wood?"
"A woodchuck schould chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood, as long as a woodchuck would chuck wood."
Gimmick (Updated )
Your point being?